Syrian footballers close in on London 2012

Amidst the chaotic political situation in Syria, one could be forgiven for presuming football is the last thing on the minds of many Syrians. Yet on Wednesday the Syrian Under-23 national football team travels to Bahrain where a victory would put them just one match away from qualifying for the London 2012 Olympic Games football tournament.

Sport has not been immune from the events of the past year in Syria. While the Syrian Premier League was suspended in 2011, matches have resumed, albeit with a large number of postponements. Syria was the only nation of twenty-two Arab countries not to send a team of athletes to the 2011 Pan Arab Games in Doha at protest of the Arab League’s suspension of their membership. Given the turbulence in the country, perhaps it was just as well that Syria were disqualified by FIFA in August 2011 from qualification for the 2014 World Cup after they fielded an ineligible player, George Murad, against Tajikistan.

But practically from nowhere and against all odds the Syrian Under-23 football side is making waves. A stunning 2-1 victory over group favourites Japan in early February, courtesy of a spectacular last-minute strike from Ahmad Al Salih, has catapulted Syria to the top of their qualification group and arguably installed them as favourites to qualify for the Olympics. Syria need to beat Bahrain this week and Malaysia next month, both of whom they have already defeated in this campaign, to guarantee their place in London, with South Korea and one of Uzbekistan or United Arab Emirates (at the expense of Australia) the other likely qualifiers from the region.

The situation is unprecedented given Syria’s previous lack of footballing pedigree, having never qualified for a World Cup or even got past the first round of the AFC Asian Cup. Even if they slip up and Japan top the group, Syria will still have further chances to reach the Olympics via playoffs first with other second place Asian teams and then potentially against Senegal in Coventry, venue for the AFC-CAF playoff.

However the victory over Japan, played on neutral territory in Amman, Jordan due to the unrest in Syria, also demonstrated the potential consequences of Syrian qualification for the Games. Although there were no direct clashes, the match was overshadowed by the politics of the conflict, with many Syrian fans opposed to President Bashar Assad cheering on Japan, while supporters of the regime chanted, "Long live, Bashar”. Should Syria qualify, it opens up the possibility of demonstrators opposed to the Syrian government and its violent repression descending on the London Olympics to protest against the regime, were the crisis not to be resolved by the summer.

The possibility of the Great Britain football team playing against Syria during the Olympics is both intriguing and sure to be immersed in political overtones. The current squad is drawn from all over Syria, from Damascus and Aleppo to Hama and Homs, cities at the sharp end of the current struggles. Both have been subject to army bombardment and fierce crackdowns in recent months.

Aside from the likely protests, the level of attention lavished on this group of young Syrians playing football in the UK at a global event would inevitably be monumental, with their actions and words under intense scrutiny. They have the potential to become the focus for a rallying cry against the Syrian government for opponents of the regime. Will the players present a united front or would political divisions manifest themselves in their performances and words? Would any players defect or speak out against their government with the world media watching and listening? What would the consequences of any resistance be?

On the other hand, a Syrian Olympic football team might represent the manifestation of sport overcoming violence and politics, possessing the ability to become a force for good. Representative as they are of all areas of Syria and its ethnic diversity, they could provide Syria a chance to show that sectarianism can be overcome and stoke a unity overcoming political chaos, violence and division.

There are distinct parallels with Libya, whose football team’s qualification for 2012 African Cup of Nations was set against the backdrop of civil war. Their impressive performance at the tournament presents a powerful example of revolution and unrest conspiring to unite, inspire and embolden a football team. In turn the exploits of the Libyan footballers offered some measure of respite, joy and unity to a beleaguered nation suffering the effects of war.

Thus it may not be simply coincidence that this upturn in performance for the Syrians is happening in the midst of national upheaval. There are indeed similarities with the form of other Arab nations’ football sides since the start of the Arab Spring. With the exception of Egypt, every North African football side (Tunisia, Libya, Algeria, Sudan and Morocco) saw their results improve in 2011 since the outbreak of their particular versions of the Arab Spring, compared with the year prior. 

Through the power of experiencing seismic events at home, footballers in these countries have shown the ability to work together during tough periods towards a common goal and success. While their country is being torn apart, the Syrian Under-23 team is clearly fostering a sense of unity and strength through adversity. The results on the field are testament to this.

One player who is highly unlikely to feature is Abdelbasset Saroot, 20-year old goalkeeper for Syria's Under-23 team, but now a leader of the revolution and a marked man on the run from the Syrian authorities in battle-scarred Homs.

Saroot recently told Al Jazeera, "It's worth it. I'm free. I've travelled all over the world to play football. But freedom is not just about me or about travelling. What about everyone else? Freedom is a big word. It's about freedom of speech and freedom of opinion. If you see something wrong being done, freedom is being able to talk about it.”

Having already lost his home, brother and friends, and survived three attempts on his life, his story will doubtless be told during the summer if his Syrian teammates are competing in the Olympics, whether he is alive or not.

Testing times: Cricket and the Twenty20 Squeeze

Stepping back from the malaise and inquests into English challenges against spin bowling or the form of their middle-order during their 3-0 drubbing by Pakistan, the series has highlighted worrying trends in worldwide Test cricket; namely the increasing prevalence of erratic results, mismatches, batting collapses and the spectacle ending prematurely.

It recalled South Africa and Australia bowling each other out for 96 and 47 respectively on a tranquil Cape Town pitch in November, Sri Lanka’s collapse at Cardiff, or India’s whitewashes at the hands of England and Australia.

Since the First Test of The Ashes in November 2011 there have been 51 Test matches played around the world. 76% (39) have seen results, only 24% (12) drawn. This compares to an all-time average of 65% versus 35%, a hefty difference and does not even account for timeless Tests running until 1939. The 100 Tests prior (July 2008-November 2011) saw a ratio of 70-30.

While not advocating drawn matches, more disturbing is the lack of Tests extending into a 5^th day, the hallmark of a mismatch or low-scoring affair. A full 51% of the last 51 Tests failed to enter the 5^th day, 12% not even reaching the conclusion of a 3^rd day, with the worst offenders being Australia, New Zealand and India.

Saeed Ajmal was chief tormentor of England batsmen in the UAE. Source: paddynapper

Perhaps most alarming is the sheer amount of comprehensive defeats inflicted across the board. These 51 Tests saw 13 innings defeats and 10 more of between 8-10 wickets or by over 250 runs.  Thus a full 45% of Test matches since November 2011 were essentially non-contests. This is no time to blame the so-called ‘minnows’ of Test cricket. Those predominantly on the receiving end were India, Australia and Sri Lanka.

Is this the ‘Twenty20 Effect’ in action?

A number of exciting recent Test matches (the India-West Indies tie or New Zealand defeating Australia by 7 runs with no side scoring above 233) cannot disguise the fact that Test cricket is being affected by techniques and temperaments increasingly more suited to shorter formats.

Andrew Strauss aired his “concerns about the state of test cricket” in October, declaring, "The administrators are trying to recognise the primacy of test cricket, but there is a real difference between saying it and making sure your actions follow it.”

The balance between the three codes is currently out of kilter, as the diminution of England’s 2012 series with South Africa to three Tests demonstrates. The Test Championship was jettisoned due to ICC Champions Trophy broadcast rights. As Twenty20 competitions take root, from the Big Bash to the IPL, the gradual yet distinctive encroachment of shorter-form cricket is clearly influencing Test batsmanship.

The Test calendar is being squeezed by Twenty20 tournaments such as the IPL. Source: SandFlash

The squeezing of the cricket calendar to accommodate more Twenty20 tournaments and ODIs brings reduced preparation time before Tests and difficulties for batsmen in adjusting between different codes within ever-shorter series. Too many good sides are being dismissed for low scores on decent pitches by generally solid bowling units. In the past 51 Tests, teams have been bowled out for under 200 on 33 occasions.

The shot selections of English batsmen in the First Test in Dubai pointed to a lack of application. As Geoff Boycott thundered, “their brains went out of the window” with only Matt Prior and Jonathan Trott demonstrating intent to “occupy the crease, show a great deal of patience and accept that runs arrive at a slower pace.”

Similarly Michael Clarke summed up Australia’s woeful collapse to 47 all out in Cape Town stating, “Our shot selection was disgraceful…Apart from numbers 10 and 11, who else even lasted 20 balls?”

Simultaneously we see selection of players for Test cricket originally identified by national set-ups for shorter forms or earmarked as “Twenty20 specialists”. One name stands out, David Warner. The young Australian opener has much to prove, but a phenomenal exhibition of hitting in his 69-ball century against India was a statement of intent. His early success could convince other nations to fast-track limited-overs stars into the Test side.

David Warner. The future of Test cricket? Source: paddynapper

The flip side of the coin is Eoin Morgan, whose selection followed a similar path to Warner’s, but is currently exhibiting the dangers associated. His unorthodox techniques, tailor-made for Twenty20 cricket, are being questioned and his response has been to attempt to manufacture his game into something it is distinctly not, a “traditional” Test player.

India’s successive 4-0 whitewashes away to Australia and England serve as a warning. They have called into question not just the enduring class of their stellar batting line-up, but the quality of the next crop of Indian Test stars raised in the cut and thrust of the IPL. As obdurate Indian batsman Aakash Chopra recently argued, the IPL created a collapse in technique and concentration and “quite bafflingly, became a parameter to judge a player for national selection”.

Cricket is witnessing the first generation of Test players who have spent the majority of their careers playing one-day and Twenty20 cricket. The squeeze is starting to be felt.

First written for All Out Cricket

Fernandes and QPR wrong to dismiss Neil Warnock

Warnock the latest victim in Premier League revolving door

Football is a tough business and managers are always first in the line of fire when results are not going the way fans, the board or the owners expect. However, the sacking of Neil Warnock is yet another classic example of owners lacking both patience and perspective, threatening to destabilise a club which had adjusted relatively well to the demands of Premier League football.

Whilst an 8-match winless run is enough to put any manager under intense pressure, perhaps it is events at Sunderland which have caught the eye of chairman Tony Fernandes, where within a month of taking charge Martin O’Neill has turned around the fortunes of a club which was languishing towards the foot of the table. 13 points from a possible 18 has resurrected Sunderland’s season that was threatening to become a fierce struggle against relegation and clearly there are hopes that a new manager may have the same effect at Loftus Road. 

The problem is that there are not too many managers of the calibre of Martin O’Neill with his Premier League experience and a proven record at improving teams, and one could argue Sunderland were in a slightly false position given the quality of their squad. Indeed the speed of the turnaround may say just as much about Steve Bruce’s management as Martin O’Neill’s. Mark Hughes is expected to take over at QPR, but is he really a big enough improvement on Neil Warnock to justify such action?

Warnock with the Championship trophy he won last season. Source: hammersmithandfulham

Statistics do not settle the debate either. On the one hand, Premier League statistics from 2005-11 show that new managers earn around three more points and improve a club’s league position by one place on average in their first 10 leagues games in charge compared with their predecessors final 10 matches. Come the end of the season, those three points could be crucial. However, as the League Managers Association so frequently points out whenever a manager’s tenure is cut short, this focus on short-term gains rarely lead to long-term success and stability.

More tellingly, last season the Premier League was the only one of the top five European leagues and lower English leagues where on average managers were sacked despite improving their clubs’ position. Too many managers are sacked when they are doing a relatively good job or have the capability of turning round a difficult spell. Such are the fiscal pressures and chronic short-termist outlook of modern football; this has become a recurring feature of the past few seasons.

Given time, could Martin Jol have turned Tottenham into the force they currently are without the need for the catastrophic tenure of Juande Ramos. Would Blackburn be in the situation they currently find themselves if Blackburn’s new owners gave Sam Allardyce a fair chance? Who is to say that Chris Hughton could not have taken Newcastle into the top 7 after it was he who settled a club that was veering from one crisis to the next? Warnock is another audition to this roll call of poorly treated managers.

Hughton was harshly dismissed by Newcastle last season. Source: mikebrown59

 Yet there are some signs that clubs are beginning to realise that the success of the likes of Manchester United and Arsenal during the Premier League era has been down to continued faith in managers and their subsequent longevity. Owen Coyle could have been dismissed when Bolton slumped to the foot of the table last month, but if anything their chairman Phil Gartside was Coyle’s most vocal supporter. Wolves and Wigan could sack Mick McCarthy or Roberto Martinez as they continue to flirt with relegation for yet another season. Even Blackburn have resisted absurd levels of criticism and abuse of their faith in Steve Kean, which began to be rewarded with 4 points from away matches with Liverpool and Manchester United over the Christmas period. Arsene Wenger and David Moyes have had their positions questioned this season, but both provide compelling cases for what a measure of managerial durability can do for club stability. Warnock himself had just become the first QPR manager in six years to complete a full season, a strategy which had clearly reaped significant dividends.

QPR have in fact adjusted relatively well to life in the Premier League. The club sat 9^th in mid-November, and are only a few wins from returning to mid-table comfort. Some of Warnock’s summer signings (Bothroyd, Wright-Phillips, DJ Campbell) have flattered to deceive, but as he has often pointed out, was not able to sign the players he had pinpointed due to the club’s ownership situation in the summer. QPR are certainly not favourites for the drop, with Wigan, Blackburn, Bolton and Wolves with as many problems, and perhaps even Norwich or Swansea could slump into trouble if their bubbles burst in a similar way to Blackpool or Hull in recent seasons.

Wenger, a testament to longevity. Source: gordonflood

Warnock had turned round a club that was languishing in 20^th place in the Championship when he arrived and enjoyed astonishing success in returning them to the Premier League after a lengthy absence, all on a shoestring budget. There was little, if no dissent from the terraces. Many fans are angry at the decision to dispense with his services. For all his ability to rile opposition players and fans or the authorities, he displayed remarkable diplomatic skills to get the best out of the mercurial Adel Taraabt and even Joey Barton was showing increased levels of calm. At the very least he deserved the whole season to keep QPR in the Premier League. On a personal level he also had a fair amount of unfinished business and a point to prove after relegation with Sheffield United in acrimonious circumstances surrounding Carlos Tevez.

Yet in the haste to establish QPR as a Premier League team and presumably raise its profile in Asia, Tony Fernandes has taken a risky and harsh decision. The chairman has admitted he will be culpable if the new manager cannot keep QPR in the Premier League. But Neil Warnock is now just another statistic in the annals of Premier League history and the tendency to unceremoniously dump a manager as a solution to any prolonged dip in form.

The Arab football Spring

The performances of the North African national football sides in 2011 have reflected the political actions of the Arab Spring

The failure of Egypt, the champions of the past three tournaments, to qualify for the 2012 African Cup of Nations (ACN), alongside the absence of regional heavyweights Cameroon and Nigeria, has thrown the tournament wide open.

Egypt’s campaign in particular was a shambles, with defeats to Sierra Leone, Niger and South Africa in the final qualification stage. But 2011 has not been an ordinary year in North Africa. With Egypt’s revolution beginning on January 25 2011 and the Arab Spring in full flow, one could be forgiven for thinking the instability in the country could not have helped its football team, particularly given the continuing uncertainties moving into 2012.

However, the list of qualifiers for the African Cup of Nations has thrown up a number of surprise names, not least Libya and Sudan, as well as (less surprisingly) Tunisia and Morocco. While Tunisia were tournament winners in 2004 after beating Morocco in the final, Sudan have made little impression on the tournament since they won the competition in 1970. Libya has hardly ever registered in African football consciousness, a runners-up spot in 1982 notwithstanding. Alongside Algeria (who just missed out of qualification), all these nations have had significant upheavals and protests during the Arab Spring and in the case of Tunisia, Libya and Egypt, regime change.

The 2010 African Cup of Nations in Angola, won by Egypt. Source: me_studio

It seems implausible that national footballers can remain unaffected by such political turmoil. With national football teams so often projected as a symbol of the nation; and aggressively so in the case of some North African states, could there be a link between the nature of political action and performances on the football field? Is there a case to make that powerful nations can be rocked by revolutions, but smaller and weaker nations can be emboldened and united by them?

So how have these six North African nations fared since the outbreak of their particular versions of the Arab Spring in the past year?

By collating the results from all matches (both competitive and friendly) since the beginning of the Arab Spring political action in each nation and comparing these results against performances from the previous 12 months (or at least eight games in the case of Morocco and Libya to ensure a fair sample size), it seems abundantly clear that almost all of the North African sides, with the dramatic exception of Egypt, have improved their results in terms of average points per match (see table below).

Apart from Egypt, 2011 has been a fantastic year for North African football

Taken as a whole, these six nations have competed in 53 matches since the start of the Arab Spring, gaining 87 points, with a 45% win ration and an average of 1.64 points per match.

In the 12 months prior to the Arab Spring (or at least eight matches stretching back into 2009 for Libya and Morocco), these same six nations contested 60 matches, but only won 79 points, with only a 33% win ratio and just 1.32 points per match.

Whilst a trend is clear, it is important to look at each country more specifically.

Egypt appears to be the exception to the rule. The country was arguably, up until 2011, the most successful team in African football during the past decade with an unprecedented three straight ACN crowns, boasting seven titles overall and have qualified for every tournament since 1982.

Although the Pharaohs had not begun their qualification campaign well, in the 12 months between their 2010 African Cup of Nations victory and the Egyptian revolution, they were boasting an average of 2 points per match including five straight wins in January 2011. This is even discounting their January 2010 ACN success, which featured 7 straight wins against high quality opposition, and would raise their points per match to a phenomenal 2.39. Their evident fall from grace has been staggering.

Since January 25 2011, Egypt have picked up one solitary win and one draw from five matches, with defeats to South Africa and Sierra Leone ensuring they finished bottom of their qualification group.

The Egyptian revolution was notable for the unity of the population in throwing off the power of President Mubarak. Indeed there was apparent cooperation in protest organisation between the fans of the rival Egyptian teams Al-Ahly and Zamalek, with the latter long regarded as a pro-government club during the Mubarak era. The only public backing to the regime came from a few club managers and Egypt’s national coach Hassan Shehata rather than fans or players.

While the other North African nations move towards new democratic regimes or have gained significant concessions from government as a result of their protests, the future for Egypt appears more convoluted and strained, demonstrated by recent protests against the interim military rulers. The ensuing instability of the post-Mubarak Egyptian nation has been echoed by poor performance on the football field.

This however, is not the general trend. Morocco, Algeria, Sudan and Tunisia have witnessed significant performance improvements since the Arab Spring, while Libya has maintained its strength overall, but has improved dramatically in competitive qualification matches.

“This is for all Libyans, for our revolution”.

So said 39-year old goalkeeper Samir Aboud upon Libya’s astonishing qualification for the 2012 African Cup of Nations, after a draw against Zambia put them though as a best runner-up.

Libyans turn out in droves to watch their side play Mozambique in September. Source: Magharebia

 Despite a recent poor run of friendly results, the Libyans are unbeaten in competitive matches since the revolution against Col. Muammar Gaddafi, notching up two wins and two draws to round off a qualification campaign that saw them go unbeaten and concede only one goal.

For a team that was significantly affected by an ongoing civil war, it was an astonishing achievement. Playing on neutral territory with a new flag, strip and anthem, coach Marcos Paquetá summed the mood up by stating the team was now "not only playing for football success but for a new government and a new country”. Even more so when you consider Col Gaddafi's son, Saadi, ran the Libyan Football Federation and was once captain of the national team. The team had been a symbol of the regime.

It has certainly not been smooth sailing. Former star playmaker Tariq Ibrahim al-Tayib was notably absent from recent matches, following pro-Gaddafi outbursts including reference to dead rebels as dogs and rats. During the conflict there were reports of 17 figures from Libyan football, including four who claimed to be members of the national side, turning up in a rebel-held town and announcing themselves as opponents of the regime.

One of them, Adel bin Issa, the coach of Tripoli’s top club al-Ahly where Saadi Gaddafi used to play, announced he had come “to send a message that Libya should be unified and free”, and he hoped “to wake up one morning to find that Gaddafi is no longer there.”

The new Libyan side, made up from players from all parts of Libya, has the potential to become a powerful new unifying force post-revolution. Their performances thus far and qualification for the African Cup of Nations may represent a good focus for new beginnings as the new nation moves into 2012.

The statistics show that Tunisia, Morocco, Sudan and Algeria have all experienced far better results in 2011 since the beginning of their respective protests or in the case of Tunisia, regime change, as compared to the 12 months preceding the Arab Spring.

Algeria, where protests led to the lifting of a 19-year old state of emergency, had a forgettable 2010, losing 8 matches and achieving an average of 0.86 points per match. Yet in 2011 Algeria won three of five matches and ended qualification on a high, only losing out to Morocco.

Even Morocco, which experienced smaller protests but significant political concessions, saw their performances improve from 1.25 points per match in 2010 to 1.75 in 2011 and finish top of their qualification group.

Kenya v Sudan. Source: Advocacy Project

Sudan, in a year when the country has experienced protest, violence and division with the breakaway of South Sudan, also qualified as a best runner-up behind Ghana in their ACN qualification group. Having played a large number of matches this year, a win ratio of 53% and a points per match of 1.79 is a huge improvement on 2010’s 25% win ratio and 1.13 points per match.

Finally Tunisia, the standout model of the Arab transition to democracy, also saw an improvement in performance from 1.27 points per match in 2010 to 1.75 in 2011 and a comfortable qualification behind Botswana.

"The events at home really stimulated our team and we believe that the players felt greatly liberated after what happened," (Esperance coach Nabil Maaloul)

While the Tunisian national team were qualifying for international competition, leading Tunisian side Esperance were winning the African Champions League. Players were keen to invoke synergies between revolution and victory on the pitch, with defender Khalil Chammam stating: "One positive thing from the revolution was that, although we suffered a lot, those changes and the suffering made us stronger -mentally and physically."

As in Egypt and Libya, Tunisian football suffered direct interference politicians before the revolutions. It was no surprise that in all three cases; national leagues were shut down upon the breakout of protests against the regimes. The majority of Libya's squad was home-based, where league football was suspended in March, while six others play in neighbouring Tunisia, where the league has only recently resumed. It is impossible to separate the fate of national footballers from politics when the impact is so great.

The paths of the North African national sides have not been universally similar. Instead they have in fact tended to replicate the upheavals themselves. Tunisia, Morocco and Algeria have seen liberalising efforts or regime change. It could be argued a new sense of liberalisation and increased freedoms has been epitomised in the successes of these national teams. Certainly in the case of Libya and Tunisia it appears that the political changes have sparked a new found unity, inspiration and rallying call, factors that have seeped through to the national football sides.

Whilst the link may be casual and the statistics do not delve any deeper than top-line numbers, the North African national football teams seem to be reflecting the mood and progress of Arab Spring and their successes are symbolic of energised nations realising their potential. Only in Egypt has the national side not been a flag bearer for success. Rather than being freed from shackles, a powerful footballing nation appears to be more confused and unstable than it was prior to the revolution. In football as in politics, confusion can breed downfall.

Follow me @matthewlbarrett

Rory McIlroy deserving of SPOTY crown

22-year old World No.2 should beat the likes of Mo Farah and Mark Cavendish to the BBC award following a remarkable year for British golf

With the BBC Sports Personality of the Year to be announced on Thursday 22^nd December, the bookie’s favourite is Mark Cavendish, following his extraordinary performances in the Tour de France and becoming Britain's first male world road race champion since 1965. Despite this and the merits of all the nominated sportsmen, the award should go to Rory McIlroy.

It was completely unjust that the ten-man shortlist was literally ten men without any female representation. At the very least Andy Murray and Amir Khan will surely have more successful years to come when they reach the top of their sports, which would be in the form of Murray finally winning a Grand Slam and Khan not only winning back his now-relinquished light-welterweight world titles, but also stepping up to welterweight to defeat Floyd Mayweather. Keri-Anne Payne and Rebecca Adlington both had better 2011s and deserved recognition. Chrissie Wellington is a phenomenon, but would Alistair Brownlee then begin to have a similar case for inclusion?

Cavendish has taken British cycling to new levels. Source: Ride On

Nevertheless, the other eight candidates all warrant serious consideration. Andrew Strauss presided over an England Test side that humbled the Australians on their own turf in The Ashes for the first time in 24 years, before setting about the ruthless 4-0 dismantling of India, the previous occupiers of the world no.1 spot which now belongs to England. Alastair Cook was the undoubted star of the victory over the Australians, although if one was being overly cynical it could be suggested that he set about punishing a toothless Australia attack on flat pitches and was far less dominant against Sri Lanka and India. If you combined Cook’s runs with Strauss’s captaincy, you would have a strong case for a winner.

Cavendish has had an exceptional 2011, and is doing more than any other cyclist to make his sport appeal to the mainstream sporting public. Cycling has tended to disappear from view in non-Olympic years, but his performances in the Tour de France and world road race have captured the limelight. The only element that counts against him is the fact that he generally had to rely upon his selfless HTC teammates to ensure that he was in a position for success. It is often forgotten that cycling is far from an individual sport.

The athletes Mo Farah and Dai Greene are both World champions. Greene now holds titles at Commonwealth, European and World level, but few would rank him above Farah for his achievements, incredible as they are. Farah won the first long distance gold for a British male at a major global championship in an event long dominated by African competitors. This speaks for itself and puts him in strong contention for the award.

Farah's performances have been taken up a level in 2011. Source: Paul Foot

However, 2011 has been the year of British golf. Luke Donald, Rory McIlroy and Lee Westwood comprise the top three of the Official World Rankings, with Donald topping the money lists on both sides of the Atlantic after clinching the Race to Dubai last weekend, reflecting his consistency at the top of the game. Although Graeme McDowell got the ball rolling in 2010, McIlroy’s triumph at the U.S. Open and Darren Clarke’s fairytale victory at The Open at Royal St. George’s were truly momentous achievements. Some fantastic players never win one. Clarke’s maiden Major title and his emotional journey have unsurprisingly put him as the second favourite behind Cavendish for the crown.

Yet McIlroy has the edge for a number of reasons. His U.S. Open victory at the Congressional was by an astonishing 8 shots, breaking a host of scoring records in the process. Since 1931, only Tiger Woods has been a younger Major Champion, which is illustrious company. He has risen to no.2 in the World Rankings and is fast catching Luke Donald following breathtaking victories in Shanghai and Hong Kong. A late season charge for the Race to Dubai came up short, but a suspected case of dengue fever cannot have helped. All this at the age of 22.

McIlroy's 2011 included a U.S. Open victory and a rise to World No.2. Source: edbalaun

Beyond the incredible performances, he achieved all this despite his meltdown during the final round of the Masters in April. Standing on the 10^th tee of the final round, he was one shot clear and there was all to play for, but a woeful drive and triple-bogey seven marked the beginning of a nightmare close to his round that was agonising to watch. For some players the recovery from experiences such as that can be long and painful. Instead McIlroy gave an incredibly mature and sensible press conference and set about winning his very next Major. It says a lot about his personality and marks McIlroy out as a true champion.

Throw in a high-profile relationship with Caroline Wozniacki and it has been quite a 2011 for Rory McIlroy. There is no doubt that he would be a worthy winner of the BBC Sports Personality of the Year for his own outstanding achievements, the manner in which he has bounced back from a nightmare beginning to 2011 and as an ambassador for the supreme health of British golf. The outlook for 2012, where he should play a prominent role in the defence of the Ryder Cup in Chicago and challenge for more Major titles, looks promising.

1^st Rory McIlroy

2^nd Mo Farah

3^rd Mark Cavendish

Resilience of Hargreaves a source of inspiration

Owen Hargreaves' second start of the season for Manchester City, against Arsenal on Tuesday evening, produced a performance that was no more than workmanlike. It certainly did not yield anything like the stunning strike earlier this season against Birmingham in the Carling Cup that crowned his return to top-level football after three injury-plagued seasons. However one could argue the quality of his performances mattered little.

Whilst the opportunity to play for Manchester City is one hardly any footballers would turn down, few footballers have been through the horrendous injuries and presumable self-doubt Hargreaves has experienced since he first broke a leg in 2006.

Like his English contemporaries Ledley King and Jonathan Woodgate, Hargreaves deserves admiration for even stepping back on to the pitch. Released by Manchester United (who seemingly saw little chance of a return to his best form) and subsequently written off by the press and much of the public, few would have begrudged him an early retirement or resuming his career at a lower standard of football.

Hargreaves in action for former club Manchester United. Source: Super MF

Having won two Champions Leagues, four Bundesligas and a Premier League title, played for two of the greatest clubs in world football and earning 42 England caps in the process, he would have been fondly remembered as a world-class midfielder denied a full career by an injury curse. With no shortage of cash and plenty of honours, an early retirement might have brought him to coaching badges, punditry and plenty of golf.

Yet Hargreaves has thrown the script out of the window. The resilience he has shown in proving his fitness, taking the original and very public path of posting YouTube training videos, and then throwing himself into the pressure cauldron of Manchester City (where he is sure to see more regular action in the second half of the season) shows both character and courage. No club will see its players put under the media spotlight as much in the coming years as Manchester City, as they attempt to rise to European greatness. Not the easiest route back from the best part of four seasons of the last five wrecked by injuries.

Hargreaves YouTube videos were bold, but paid off. 

While suffering years of injuries, particularly those involving knees and tendonitis, Hargreaves must have continually questioned his body’s ability to stand up to top level football and the impact these or any future injuries could have later in life. One fears for the long-term damage done to the likes of Hargreaves or Ledley King, who cannot even train in between matches. Will they have any regrets in 15 years’ time?

Having incurred three years of chronic knee pain myself, deciding to stop playing competitive football, even at my lowly level, has been a tough process. Mentally I lost the confidence to play as I dwelled on my injury.  I no longer trust my body to come through the rigours of tackling and am reluctant to compromise my future health and mobility. And my injuries were certainly not on the scale of Hargreaves, King or Woodgate. These players have had plenty of time to reflect on the damage these injuries have had on their bodies, yet fight to resume their careers, albeit with the assistance of the best medical staff around.

Ledley King has also bounced back this season following injury nightmares. Source: TottenhamFan

Without his injury nightmares, one wonders how many more England caps Hargreaves could have won. He seems to be the piece of the England puzzle we have been missing for so long, industrious in defence and possessing quality dead ball skills and quality distribution (although the emergence of Scott Parker into Capello’s plans in the past 12 months may have partly provided a solution).

Were Owen Hargreaves to get back into England squad it would be a borderline miracle. He would surely settle for 10 appearances this season and to progress from there. I root for him and all other players suffering chronic or major injury who strive to return to the field of play. There is the sense that these are the footballers who no longer desire financial rewards, but to continue performing a job they not only love, but is also all they know.

My admiration is not just for Hargreaves’ footballing ability, but his desire to resume playing at the top level, despite the knowledge his body might break down again and the potential implications for his health later down the line. 

Capello takes a leaf out of Mourinho’s book

The anti-football of Mourinho and Capello can reap rewards, but more is needed for England to be contenders for EURO 2012

On the face of it, it was not overly surprising. The 7^th best team in the world, England, beat the best team in the world, Spain, 1-0 at home in a friendly international. Bearing in mind that Spain also lost friendlies to Italy, Portugal and Argentina since they won the World Cup last summer, it certainly is not a result that will cause too many ripples in world football.

It was the manner of victory that was far more interesting. Some commentators have suggested the victory paid homage to Capello’s ultra-defensive catenaccio ways so successfully employed in the 1990s with Milan, with a solid back four and protection from deep lying and combative midfielders frustrating Spain. Along with much of the Spanish team, Cesc Fabregas labelled England’s gameplan as “negative tactics”, lambasting them for “lacking in talent” and setting up to defend for nearly the entire 90 minutes.

However, the whole scenario has parallels with far more recent events. Given the core of players who make both Spain and Barcelona tick and the similarities in style, to all intents and purposes it is the Barcelona influence (supplemented by the best of Real Madrid) that has made Spain both European and World champions. And the only man who has been able to find the methods to challenge the Barcelona way in the past few seasons has been a long time friend of the English, Jose Mourinho. Two series of fixtures in particular spring to mind.

Mourinho's anti-football has regularly riled Barcelona. Source: prismatico

April 2010 witnessed a Champions League semi-final between Mourinho’s Internazionale and Barcelona. The first leg demonstrated a Mourinho masterclass of defensive pressing and swift counter attack as Inter won 3-1. The 2^nd leg, despite Inter losing 1-0, was in truth even more impressive. Down to 10 men for over an hour, Inter soaked up everything Barcelona could throw at them. The statistics were bewildering. Inter managed just 67 passes as opposed to Barca’s 548 and over 80% possession. There were even charges (though denied by Mourinho) that Inter were happy to give the ball to Barcelona so as to not disrupt their own defensive shape.

Fast-forward a year to the latter end of last season. Mourinho’s Real Madrid held Barcelona to a 1-1 draw in La Liga followed swiftly by a 1-0 victory in extra time over their archrivals in the Copa del Rey. In both these matches, Mourinho operated with a ‘trivote’ system, sacrificing an attacking player in favour of a defensive midfielder.

Mourinho used Pepe, a natural central defender, as a midfield enforcer alongside Xabi Alonso and Sami Khedira, all focusing on defensive tasks and keeping Barcelona largely at bay. The use of Phil Jones in a side also containing James Milner, Frank Lampard and the imperious Scott Parker on Saturday bore considerable resemblance to this strategy.

Parker clashes with the Spanish midfield. Source: nrssmith

Over these two fixtures, Real Madrid registered a mere 22% possession and 65% pass success as opposed to Barca’s 78% possession and 90% pass success. Yet it reaped dividends for Mourinho – and almost continued to work in the Champions League semi-final between the clubs until Madrid were reduced to 10 men and Messi ran riot.

To anyone who watched England soak up the Spanish possession (71%) and pressure continuously on Saturday evening, this may make familiar reading. This is not to suggest this is the way football should be played all the time. It is definitely not what England should look to repeat too often. And it certainly will not work every time it is tried. But under the right circumstances the methods employed by Capello on Saturday can be very effective.

Ultimately the most important question is whether England can be contenders at EURO 2012. Much has been made of England’s ongoing attempts to emulate the Spanish style, assurance on the ball and technique with the next generation of players. Nevertheless to be contenders in the short term, England must not necessarily look to Spain. The gulf in class is too great at present. In fact we should look to Germany for inspiration.

Germany in South Africa - showing England the way forward. Source: liznn7

England should build on the defensive prowess and determination that they have long been renowned for and personified by Scott Parker against Spain. The challenge for England is to add the power, pace and counter-attacking devastation of the type displayed by Germany at the last World Cup to a steely defence. If Bent and Walcott are not the answer, then the likes of Sturridge, Welbeck, Adam Johnson, Ashley Young and Aaron Lennon could well have parts to play in the absence of Wayne Rooney and the increasingly injury plagued Steven Gerrard and Jack Wilshere. If Capello manages to blend the right personnel before EURO 2012, England might be able to compete with the top nations next summer.