Rory McIlroy deserving of SPOTY crown

22-year old World No.2 should beat the likes of Mo Farah and Mark Cavendish to the BBC award following a remarkable year for British golf

With the BBC Sports Personality of the Year to be announced on Thursday 22^nd December, the bookie’s favourite is Mark Cavendish, following his extraordinary performances in the Tour de France and becoming Britain's first male world road race champion since 1965. Despite this and the merits of all the nominated sportsmen, the award should go to Rory McIlroy.

It was completely unjust that the ten-man shortlist was literally ten men without any female representation. At the very least Andy Murray and Amir Khan will surely have more successful years to come when they reach the top of their sports, which would be in the form of Murray finally winning a Grand Slam and Khan not only winning back his now-relinquished light-welterweight world titles, but also stepping up to welterweight to defeat Floyd Mayweather. Keri-Anne Payne and Rebecca Adlington both had better 2011s and deserved recognition. Chrissie Wellington is a phenomenon, but would Alistair Brownlee then begin to have a similar case for inclusion?

Cavendish has taken British cycling to new levels. Source: Ride On

Nevertheless, the other eight candidates all warrant serious consideration. Andrew Strauss presided over an England Test side that humbled the Australians on their own turf in The Ashes for the first time in 24 years, before setting about the ruthless 4-0 dismantling of India, the previous occupiers of the world no.1 spot which now belongs to England. Alastair Cook was the undoubted star of the victory over the Australians, although if one was being overly cynical it could be suggested that he set about punishing a toothless Australia attack on flat pitches and was far less dominant against Sri Lanka and India. If you combined Cook’s runs with Strauss’s captaincy, you would have a strong case for a winner.

Cavendish has had an exceptional 2011, and is doing more than any other cyclist to make his sport appeal to the mainstream sporting public. Cycling has tended to disappear from view in non-Olympic years, but his performances in the Tour de France and world road race have captured the limelight. The only element that counts against him is the fact that he generally had to rely upon his selfless HTC teammates to ensure that he was in a position for success. It is often forgotten that cycling is far from an individual sport.

The athletes Mo Farah and Dai Greene are both World champions. Greene now holds titles at Commonwealth, European and World level, but few would rank him above Farah for his achievements, incredible as they are. Farah won the first long distance gold for a British male at a major global championship in an event long dominated by African competitors. This speaks for itself and puts him in strong contention for the award.

Farah's performances have been taken up a level in 2011. Source: Paul Foot

However, 2011 has been the year of British golf. Luke Donald, Rory McIlroy and Lee Westwood comprise the top three of the Official World Rankings, with Donald topping the money lists on both sides of the Atlantic after clinching the Race to Dubai last weekend, reflecting his consistency at the top of the game. Although Graeme McDowell got the ball rolling in 2010, McIlroy’s triumph at the U.S. Open and Darren Clarke’s fairytale victory at The Open at Royal St. George’s were truly momentous achievements. Some fantastic players never win one. Clarke’s maiden Major title and his emotional journey have unsurprisingly put him as the second favourite behind Cavendish for the crown.

Yet McIlroy has the edge for a number of reasons. His U.S. Open victory at the Congressional was by an astonishing 8 shots, breaking a host of scoring records in the process. Since 1931, only Tiger Woods has been a younger Major Champion, which is illustrious company. He has risen to no.2 in the World Rankings and is fast catching Luke Donald following breathtaking victories in Shanghai and Hong Kong. A late season charge for the Race to Dubai came up short, but a suspected case of dengue fever cannot have helped. All this at the age of 22.

McIlroy's 2011 included a U.S. Open victory and a rise to World No.2. Source: edbalaun

Beyond the incredible performances, he achieved all this despite his meltdown during the final round of the Masters in April. Standing on the 10^th tee of the final round, he was one shot clear and there was all to play for, but a woeful drive and triple-bogey seven marked the beginning of a nightmare close to his round that was agonising to watch. For some players the recovery from experiences such as that can be long and painful. Instead McIlroy gave an incredibly mature and sensible press conference and set about winning his very next Major. It says a lot about his personality and marks McIlroy out as a true champion.

Throw in a high-profile relationship with Caroline Wozniacki and it has been quite a 2011 for Rory McIlroy. There is no doubt that he would be a worthy winner of the BBC Sports Personality of the Year for his own outstanding achievements, the manner in which he has bounced back from a nightmare beginning to 2011 and as an ambassador for the supreme health of British golf. The outlook for 2012, where he should play a prominent role in the defence of the Ryder Cup in Chicago and challenge for more Major titles, looks promising.

1^st Rory McIlroy

2^nd Mo Farah

3^rd Mark Cavendish

England are number one, but the real test is ahead

Tough battles on the Subcontinent and with the South Africans will be the true measure of this England side

English cricket is scaling dizzy heights. The England cricket team are now officially ranked the best side in the world. They are currently demolishing the previous holders of that position, India, in a manner so ruthless and comprehensive that it is scarcely believable to an English media and public unaccustomed to watching such scintillating performances.

Listening to post match interviews following the 3^rd Test at Edgbaston, the England players were at their media-trained best, although the joy was evident. However, it was Kevin Pietersen who offered the most revealing insight, when he implied that England must learn the lessons from the 2005 Ashes and not allow this summer to be a high watermark before a fall.

The England team cannot afford to, nor are they likely to, get caught up in the hype, which will inevitably go into overdrive. To justify claims of being “the best England side ever”, or to be mentioned in the same sentence as the West Indians of the 1980s or the Australians of the Taylor/Waugh/Ponting eras, this England side must maintain their current dominance and form for at least the next 18 months. They must beat Sri Lanka and India in the Subcontinent and overcome the mighty South Africans at home, all significant tasks confronting them.

Strauss is still a long way off emulating Ponting. Source: pj_in_oz

It would be much easier to assess where exactly this England side rates at the present time if Sehwag, Gambhir, Harbhajan Singh, Yuvraj Singh and Zaheer Khan had all been fit for the entirety of this series. Regardless of the problems of the Indian side, the England bowling displays have been magnificent, the fielding generally top class. Borderline faultless. Nevertheless some concerns still remain with the batting, particularly against quality seam bowling.

It seems to have been quickly forgotten that during two of their first three innings this series, England had collapsed to 62-5 and 124-8 in the face of good seam bowling from Khan, Kumar and Sharma, before Broad and Prior came to our rescue. Cook, Strauss and Morgan were all struggling and not many would have been predicting a 4-0 series whitewash.

While you could argue that the fact we won from these positions shows the best qualities of this side, it is hardly a case of complete domination. In fact, it should raise concerns about how we fare when South Africa and their attack of Morkel, Steyn, Kallis, Parnell and Tsotsobe arrive here next summer. Let us not forget that the only series we have not won in the past nine was in South Africa. And we escaped with a 1-1 draw only when Graham Onions twice held off the South African pace attack with the South Africans requiring only one more English wicket for victory. Anyone remember Friedel de Wet in Centurion?

 The last time the South Africans toured in 2008. Source captainsticky

This is not to advocate any changes, far from it. England must stick with their trusted players and formula for success. It is only to serve warning that everything might not be so rosy against Pakistan or South Africa in the coming 12 months.

To highlight some key examples. Alastair Cook, England’s most prolific batsman of the past year and now 3^rd in the ICC Rankings, still has some problems in home Tests when the ball is swinging, as exhibited against Pakistan last summer and against India in the first two Tests. It seems bizarre to say this in the aftermath of a wonderful 294, but it comes as no surprise that Cook averages 55 away from home in Test cricket as opposed to ‘only’ 45 in English conditions. The South Africans may well see Cook and Strauss as presenting good opportunities to strike early.

Eoin Morgan, a class act against spin and when the ball is more than 30 overs old, will have a testing 12 months ahead of him. He has scored well in less pressurised periods (a similar charge to the one Ian Bell faced for a number of years), but is not as prolific against the new ball, either after a spate of early wickets or at the 80 over replacement mark, as was witnessed by two ducks and Kumar dismissing him with his second ball after a new ball was taken at Trent Bridge. Andy Flower would no doubt like to see a big innings under pressure when England are 30-4.

England have a testing 12 months ahead. Source gareth1953

Although these seem minor issues, there is just a small sense that the wonderful bowling and fielding performances have masked over the fact that the English batting has been under pressure at key points. Pakistan will be a big test this winter (I can see a number of low scoring matches, with the ball dominating), as will playing in the tough conditions of Sri Lanka and India (and how we fare at accommodating a second spinner).

Yet it is South Africa next summer that should mark the time at which we are either confirmed as the best cricket side of a generation and worthy of comparison with great sides in history, or a side that reached its high point during 2010-11.

Class is permanent. Form is fickle. A cricketing tale.

England must stick with their under-performing Test stars Broad, KP and Strauss

Friday 20^th August 2010. England v Pakistan. The third day of the Third test at The Oval. Alastair Cook is on 23 and playing for his England Test place. Wahab Riaz runs in and finds the edge as Cook plays a terribly unconvincing shot. 

Alastair Cook is caught at 2^nd slip and trudges off the field following another failure.

Successive scores of 8, 12, 17, 4, 6 and 23 finally convince the England selectors to make a change with only one more Test before the Ashes squad selection. Cook is dropped and not included in the squad to Australia. In his absence Jonathan Trott moves up to open, with Eoin Morgan brought into the side. In the event, England lose the First Test of the Ashes in Brisbane, falling 221 runs behind after the first innings and despite a valiant effort, are eventually beaten by 6 wickets. Australia ultimately retains The Ashes with a 3-1 victory.

Except this is not how events transpired. Cook’s loose cut outside his off-stump to Riaz dissected the slip cordon at easily catchable height with 2^nd and 3^rd slip leaving it for one another. I recall this moment very clearly as commentator Ramiz Raja wryly observed, "Shouting 'yours' is really not much use in the slips”. But more importantly, there was a real sense that something important might just have happened.

Arguably this was the most important ball in world cricket in 2010. Cook went on to score 110.

Image: cormac70

The rest is history. Cook went to Australia and produced one of the finest series displays of batting in history. He scored 235 not out in the First Test and dominated the Australian bowling attack from the outset, doing more than anyone else to secure a famous Ashes victory with an astonishing 766 runs and a world record time batting in a five Test series, 2,171 minutes (36 hours).

This immediately raises plenty of questions on form, class, belief in ability and confidence, and their relative importance in all team sport, not just cricket. If ‘form’ can be re-discovered as a result of a moment of lucky escape, should we not place more faith in long-term class? If confidence can be restored on the basis of one display, should we not place more faith in constant selection and loyalty?

Indeed, what is form? There is an argument to suggest, “form does not exist”. A player is either good or bad, form is fickle and one moment can change an entire notion of a player being in form. Perhaps this is too far, though I would advocate that maintaining confidence and technique are more important factors to focus on rather than any idea of ‘form’, especially for a player with the undoubted ability to have already reached the top level.

Cook is now relentlessly setting about breaking English cricket records. 67^th consecutive Test, a record. Youngest Englishman to 5,000 runs. Four centuries away from England’s record centurion-makers.

 Resurrection. Image: stuandgravy

The esteem with which our new ODI captain is held in by the England fans, media and selectors is a far cry from 12 months ago. Before his career-saving Pakistan century, the Daily Telegraph was running polls entitled “Can England afford to pick Alastair Cook for the Ashes tour?” The Evening Standard asserted that “If Alastair Cook fails one more time, then selectors must drop him” and message boards were awash with fans calling for Cook’s head.

Surely the example of Cook’s resurrection is a lesson to be learnt. Yet a similar level of clamour for dropping an England player has recently surfaced with Kevin Pietersen and the spotlight is currently fixed firmly on Stuart Broad and even more worryingly on Andrew Strauss. All are under pressure to justify their places in the England Test side.

Yes, these players have been slightly out of form, but not to the extent Cook was in 2010, and certainly not enough to warrant being discarded. Key to the success of this England team has been the consistency of selection and fostering of a strong team ethic.

Lessons should not only be learnt from the Cook case but also from comparison with our vanquished Australian opponents.

Australia chopped and changed through 17 players during The Ashes, particularly unsettling their bowling attack. Doherty, Beer, Smith, Harris, Bollinger, Johnson, Siddle, Hilfenhaus – only Siddle was an ever-present and it showed. England on the other hand, made only one non-enforced change, when Bresnan came in for Finn prior to the 4^th Test.

 Australia in trouble. Image: piesgardiner

It has always struck me as a universal truth that the best teams in sport, and particularly cricket, are those who keep faith with their chosen men and build a winning side with a strong team mentality. 

Continuity, a winning mentality and a strong unit breeds success. The Australian cricket team of the 1990s and early 2000s was characterised by an almost unshakeable faith that an under-pressure player would come good. Players should only be dropped when performances and technique are dire or a young pretender is making strides impossible to ignore. Too often media and fans leap on to the next out-of-form target for criticism overly hastily.

Class is permanent and worth persevering with, as Alastair Cook demonstrated. The England cricketers deserve support for the entire summer series with India and the chance to finish off a spectacular 12 months.